Guy Glorieux wrote:
> Hey Taco,
>
> Glad you got overruled on digital pinhole... -:)
> My submission was digital pinhole...
> http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2008/index.php?id=327
>
> I agree that *"digital pinhole" is a conceptual aberration*.
> and so is digital photography.
>
> But they both exist and they offer a wide spectrum of possibilities
>
> The debate is open!
>
>
That's exactly the point, Guy:
"(digital) offers a wide spectrum of possibilities"
Where a paper negative pinholer has ONE shot and a film pinholer with
120 film 8 - 12, a digital pinholer can shoot 250 tol 1000 (depending on
his memory card) in the "LOMO STYLE" (just point from the hip and shoot)
without any thinking or reflections WHAT, WHY, HOW etc and then select
just the one of the two thousand that was the best (or not so bad as the
others). Just compare that with a conventional slide film lens
photographer who has to THINK in forehand about the W, W & H for not
spoiling precious film. Can you imagine me running araund on WPPD with
2000 one shot cardboard boxes?
Exactly you with your Montreal hotel room pinhole (which I admire)
disappoint me with your new mind/opinion
And now the debate can really start ;-)
taco
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Jun 3 13:21:26 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 02 Dec 2008 - 02:00:02 PST