Re: attatched photos

From: George L Smyth <glsmyth_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Thu 06 Sep 2007 - 18:11:35 PDT

--- Ellis Cory <ellis103@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> George wrote......Technically there is no problem.........
>
> Thank you, thank you, thank you.
>
> ..........I guess the question then goes back to you - what is the problem
> with providing a link?..........
>
> As I mentioned before, I don't have a website or Flicker or any other kind
> of link. I have been lead to believe that scanning a picture, downsizing it
> and attaching is quicker than all the other uploading to a link connections
> that is necessary and if the picture is one that is not needed to be kept,
> then you don't fill up your storage space.
> ATB
> Ellis

Ellis -

Whether you attach or upload, you still have to scan and optimize the image.
Attaching and uploading are essentially the same thing, with the exception that
Yahoo Mail is a bit more difficult than other mail programs when it comes to
attaching a file to your email.

Like I've said in the past, I have plenty of room on my website (actually, I
have four personal websites) and would be more than happy to post images for
people. If there is any kind of demand at all, I'd be glad to provide a
program that would allow the individual to upload themselves.

Cheers -

george

-------------------------------------

   Eclectic Mix: http://EclecticMix.com
   One Minute How-To: http://OneMinuteHowTo.com
   DRiP Investing: http://DRiPInvesting.org

   Handmade Photographic Images: http://www.GLSmyth.com - Blog: GLSmyth.Wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Thu Sep 6 18:11:42 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 21 Jan 2008 - 02:00:02 PST