Re: attatched photos

Ellis wrote:

> If someone has taken the trouble to raise a point or question about my
> suggestion, then I think it is only right for me to respond to them and
> answer their points. Especially as no valid reason has been given for the
> idea not to work eg the way this particular program has been written cannot
> use attachments and the program is of a computer type that cannot be
> updated, then I would understand, but as it seems it is only preference,
> despite the fact that millions of others on hundreds of sites send thousands
> of attachments each day (including those on dial-up) it seems to me to be an
> excuse. After all, my suggestion was not an 'either/or' but a 'both/and',
> you do whatever is best for you.

Since I was the first to raise an objection (due to my slow dial-up) and this seems to
have <cough> become an issue, allow me to recind my objection. If this list becomes
too tedious to download (which I don't really expect), I will accept that technology has
passed me bye and find a group that will correspond by carrier pigeon or smoke signal.

Chris Ellinger
Ann Arbor, MI

http://www.ellingerphoto.com/
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Fri Aug 31 09:16:42 2007