John Fletcher wrote:
> It does not currently cater for reciprocity failure primarily because
> the Provia F100 I use does not seem to have much. Being a film based
> parameter that would necessitate, currently, under or over stating the
> film speed you are using after taking a meter reading. Reprocity failure
> compensation would actually not be hard to program I am just worried
> that there may be hundreds of different papers / films people can use
> all with different characteristics.
If you look in Michael Covington's "Astrophotography for the Amateur"
you'll find a discussion of reciprocity failure, a formula for
adjusting exposure based on time and a film parameter, and a method
for testing film to determine the parameter.
Robert Reeves has a web page online
<http://www.robertreeves.com/filmtest.htm> that show a similar method.
This is also discussed in his book "Wide-Field Astrophotography".
-- Brian Reynolds | "It's just like flying a spaceship. reynolds@panix.com | You push some buttons and see http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ | what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan NAR# 54438 | _______________________________________________ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML pinhole-discussion mailing list pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.htmlReceived on Thu Aug 10 14:26:44 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 02:01:17 PST