Hi Matti--
Thanks for looking at my work and the nice comments.
I suppose if you put a pinhole over a lens, it wouldn't be a true
pinhole, but might be worth trying. I think the lens would still affect
the depth of field? Has anyone on the list ever done this? Other than
that, if you have or can get your hands on a 35mm camera with removable
lens, you can mount a pinhole in a spare bodycap with a hole drilled in
it. I have done that with my digital Olympus E-Volt E500; I have one cap
with a pinhole and another with a pinhole sieve mounted in it.
Or you could make a pinhole camera; there are many websites out there
that give very good detailed instructions.
Thanks again--
Jan
Matti Koskinen wrote:
> Great pictures, made me want to grab a pinhole camera again.
> Really nice!
>
> As I don't have a dslr, but Dimage a200, what would come out, if I
> attach a pinhole in front of the lens? The images might lack the
> dreamy quality because of the lens, but a small pinhole may give an
> infinite depth-of-field?
-- Fine art photography of Jan Kapoor at www.jankapoor.net Pinhole, large format, alternative printing processes and digital. _______________________________________________ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML pinhole-discussion mailing list pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.htmlReceived on Sun Jul 2 17:31:48 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 02:01:17 PST