RE: Giclee vs other names

Yes, permanent pigment print does describe a carbon print but who would
call their carbon print that.

--
Pinhole Blender
chris@pinholeblender.com
http://www.pinholeblender.com
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Giclee vs other names
> From: Brian Reynolds <reynolds@panix.com>
> Date: Tue, December 13, 2005 10:47 pm
> To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
>
> Pinhole Blender wrote:
> > > From: Murray Leshner <murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com>
> > >
> > > I believe the person who asserts to have comeup with
> > > the term "giclee" is a member of this list, or maybe
> > > cameramakers; I can't remember, so this is not a
> > > personal dig at him...
>
> Back on the old Leben epson-inkjet list it was said that Nash Editions
> came up with the name Giclee for their Iris prints.
>
> > > I am curious what other terms are widely accepted to
> > > refer to this process.
> > >
> > On Inkjetart.com they prefer to call archival inkjet print "permanent
> > pigment prints"
>
> That could just as easily describe a carbon print.
>
> --
> Brian Reynolds                  | "It's just like flying a spaceship.
> reynolds@panix.com              |  You push some buttons and see
> http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan
> NAR# 54438                      |
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> pinhole-discussion mailing list
> pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html