RE: Wet vs. Dry

From: Loris Medici <loris_medici_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 29 Nov 2005 - 00:49:28 PST

I'm not a gallery owner but exhibit in galleries and sell works (not
often and can't make a living of it but it covers my photography
expenses).

Will chime with two words: "Hand Made"

I personally think longevity (when compared to silver) is almost a
non-issue with new inks and quality papers (I also make quadtone
pigmented inkjet prints).

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
[mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org] On Behalf Of Tom A
Lindsay
Sent: 29 Kasım 2005 Salı 00:20
To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Wet vs. Dry

...
OK, gallery people out there, please tell me why inkjet is still looked
down on as kind of ho-hum second rate. If Epson says that they will last
80-100 years plus, what's the problem? I don't have the room for a
traditional darkroom and thought I'd go inkjet since they've come a long
way in the archival life of the prints that are coming out now days.
...
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Nov 29 00:45:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:01 PST