Re: vera lutter pieces on eBay

----- Original Message -----
From: "Guy Glorieux" <guy.glorieux@sympatico.ca>
To: <pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] vera lutter pieces on eBay

> And then she says:
> "My intention was not to make a photograph as such but to make a
conceptual
> piece that in its own way repeated and transformed what I had observed. "

That reminds me of a NG thread long time ago. I guy posted an image of a
dog-house in his backyard and was looking for feedback, this other guy
replied using words like metaphor, existensialism, pre-visualization,
conceptual versus perceptual qualities of the image, etc to which the
original poster and owner of the image replied: common!! it is just a dog
house!!.

> I wish I could write such a clear "art statement" about my own giant
pinhole
> photography work...

One of the greatest and "clearer" I ever read was for this piece
http://tinyurl.com/ywgm6 , that BTW Guy, it hangs 2 hrs from you at the
National Gallery of Canada. Some years ago I drove 450kms just to see for
myself if it actually was worth the 1.8 million bucks the goverment paid for
it.

"Voice of Fire: Think not of it as a pathway of a 'sequence' of
gedankenexperiment simpletons where heir-lines are a prima facie case of a
paradiachronic transitivity. Rather think of it as a chain strength
possibility of what, eventually, comes out as a product of epistemic
conditions, considered as the reciprocal substitution of semiotic material
for a dialogical product in a dynamic reflexion. :-)

Guillermo
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Fri Nov 4 07:09:34 2005