RE: Zero 2000 with 220er Film - experience?

From: Pinhole Blender <chris_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Wed 03 Aug 2005 - 21:01:35 PDT

This will work for the amount of turns between frames but you still need
to determine how many turns till frame number 1. Also, remember to cover
the counter window with black tape.

Chris

--
Pinhole Blender
chris@pinholeblender.com
http://www.pinholeblender.com
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zero 2000 with 220er Film -
> experience?
> From: Jason Schlauch <jason.schlauch@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, August 03, 2005 2:44 pm
> To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
>
> I believe the 220 film emulsion is identical to 120 film emulsion
> which is roughly identical (in thickness) to any other film, so maybe
> if you have a scrap of exposed or developed film you could substitute
> that in place of paper in my earlier suggestion.
>
> Also, according to the Wikipedia article on 120/220 film, 220 film is
> 144cm long:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/120_film
>
> The article also lists other film dimensions which may be of help to you.
>
> Strictly speaking, if film spools have an inner core that's a
> consistent size, it should be possible to determine how many degrees
> to turn the knob on any camera and have it advance one frame.  You
> could mark degrees around the knob and turn it N degrees per frame.
> The downside is that I have enough problems remembering if I've wound
> the camera between frames when there are only 12 numbers to worry
> about.  360 numbers seems like a much larger headache.
>
> On 8/3/05, Christina <darvida@gmx.at> wrote:
> > Hey, thats a good Idea!
> > Does someone know how long a 22er film actally is?
> > And how about the thickness of the film...
> > Is it like paper?
> > Lg
> > Christina
> >
> > http://www.fotografisches.at
> > http://www.x-posure.fotografisches.at
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------Joch Christina----------------
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > [mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org] On Behalf Of Jason Schlauch
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 20:05
> > To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zero 2000 with 220er Film - experience?
> >
> > Actually, thinking about this some more, you can probably get away
> > with substituting a piece of paper wrapped around the take-up spool if
> > you don't feel like sacrificing a roll of film.
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Christina <darvida@gmx.at> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the help.
> > > So I guess I will take one of the films and let it through the cam with an
> > > opend back, mark the frames and write down how often to wind the knob.
> > > Lg
> > > Christina
> > >
> > > http://www.fotografisches.at
> > > http://www.x-posure.fotografisches.at
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> > > pinhole-discussion mailing list
> > > pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > > FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> > pinhole-discussion mailing list
> > pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> > pinhole-discussion mailing list
> > pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> pinhole-discussion mailing list
> pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Wed Aug 3 21:01:15 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:01 PST