Re: Shooting infra-red in your pinhole

From: Tony Wingo <akw_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Mon 21 Mar 2005 - 16:38:33 PST

>Has anyone tried this?
>
>I'm wondering if there is anything inparticular to consider. For
>instance, are there different rules for calculating reciprocity
>failure?

Unfortunately, reciprocity information for IR films available in 120
is hard to come by. I just assume that it is similar to Plus-X.

>Would I need to attach a filter in front of pinhole?

Yes. I use a gel filter immediately beind the pinhole. I believe it's
an 87B, but it might be an 89. It's been a while.

>
>I'm shooting 120 format. Is there any 120 film partial to decent
>pinhole results?

I've been using the MACO 820. It has two disadvantages:

1. It's extremely slow: In bright sunlight 6 minutes exposures are
typical. Bring a book. (Note: MACO has announced plans for a faster
IR film, but it's not in production yet).

2. The emulsion is extremely soft and prone to damage. It has to be
handled with extreme care, even when dry.

I haven't actually done that much IR pinhole, but there are a few
examples on my web site.

-- 
-tony
http://www.shapesandshadows.com
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Mon Mar 21 16:38:17 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:00 PST