Re: Lomography?

I take that back. It appears 'they' have embraced pinhole .... seven
hour exposures, hmmm not exactly 'from the hip'

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:15:03 +0000, odusseus <polutropos@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's an attitude towards making pictures with a camera. It breaks the
> photographer out of socio-cultural conditioning. It's the opposite
> approach to visualizing the picture you want to create. I think it has
> a place and it can free you up enough for it to allow you to be more
> cretive, less 'straight-jacketed'. I was probably trapped in the box
> of playing safe and Lomo got me clean out of there. On the other hand
> Lomo is something of a marketing hype, but that's not the be all and
> end all.
>
> BTW it isn't pinhole!
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:28:49 -0800 (PST), Murray Leshner
> <murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I am getting the impression that "Lomography" doesn't
> > necessarily refer to cameras made by LOMO.
> >
> > Does it imply something about the level of quality of
> > construction or the randomness of results?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Murray
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> > pinhole-discussion mailing list
> > pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> > FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Sun Mar 20 15:34:44 2005