Re: Lomography?

From: odusseus <polutropos_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Sun 20 Mar 2005 - 15:15:03 PST

It's an attitude towards making pictures with a camera. It breaks the
photographer out of socio-cultural conditioning. It's the opposite
approach to visualizing the picture you want to create. I think it has
a place and it can free you up enough for it to allow you to be more
cretive, less 'straight-jacketed'. I was probably trapped in the box
of playing safe and Lomo got me clean out of there. On the other hand
Lomo is something of a marketing hype, but that's not the be all and
end all.

BTW it isn't pinhole!

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:28:49 -0800 (PST), Murray Leshner
<murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am getting the impression that "Lomography" doesn't
> necessarily refer to cameras made by LOMO.
>
> Does it imply something about the level of quality of
> construction or the randomness of results?
>
> Thanks
>
> Murray
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> pinhole-discussion mailing list
> pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Sun Mar 20 15:14:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:00 PST