Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #229

--- pinhole-discussion-digest
<owner-pinhole-discussion-digest@spitbite.org> wrote:

>
> pinhole-discussion-digest Tuesday, March 1 2005
> Volume 01 : Number 229
>
>
>
> Please DO NOT QUOTE the entire digest when replying
> to a posting,
> only quote the message you are replying to.
>
> Included in this issue:
> [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> [pinhole-discussion] grass store
> RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
> Re: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong negatives
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:49:18 -0800
> From: "Marcy Merrill" <marcy@merrillphoto.com>
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] scanning loooong
> negatives
>
> Okay you buncha geniuses, I poked through the
> archives and couldn't find
> anything about scanning long negatives. I've made a
> pinhole camera using an
> old Kodak movie can.
> www.merrillphoto.com/canorama.htm
> It's got 20 holes and uses 35mm film. So, there's
> one exposure on a piece of
> film that's about 2 feet long. I've got a scanner
> that'll scan negatives up to
> 5x7. So I can scan this negative in bits and paste
> it together. My problem is
> that each scan is slightly different and the end
> result shows where everything
> was pasted....AND it takes too darn long ... AND it
> doesn't look very good. Is
> there a better way? I suppose I could make a contact
> print and scan that and I
> might have a little bit better result. Thanks in
> advance! -Marcy
>
> www.JunkStoreCameras.com
>
I USE A CANON 9900F AND SUGGEST TAHT YOU MAKE A NEW
CARRIER, MAT BOARD IS GOOD IF YOU CAN BARE TO CUT THE
NEG IN TWO YOU MAY BE ABLE TO SCAN IT IN ONE GO
CUTTING TWO 1 FOOT BY 24MM APERTURES IVE DONE THIS FOR
LONG NEGS FROM PINHOLE BLENDER NEGS AND IT SEEMS TO
WORK FINE IT STILL MAY NEED A BIT OF PS WORK BUT
SHOULDNT BE TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM

BTW...ITS IMPORTANT(AT LEAST ON MY CONOSCAN) TO MAKE
SURE TO REPLICATE ANY CALIBRATION SLOTS, HOLES ETC ON
YOUR NEW CARRIER

HOPE THIS HELPS

CALLUM

        
                
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Wed Mar 2 01:51:14 2005