Re: scanning loooong negatives

From: Brian Reynolds <reynolds_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 01 Mar 2005 - 08:06:09 PST

Marcy Merrill wrote:
> Okay you buncha geniuses, I poked through the archives and couldn't
> find anything about scanning long negatives. I've made a pinhole
> camera using an old Kodak movie can.
> www.merrillphoto.com/canorama.htm It's got 20 holes and uses 35mm
> film. So, there's one exposure on a piece of film that's about 2
> feet long. I've got a scanner that'll scan negatives up to 5x7. So
> I can scan this negative in bits and paste it together. My problem
> is that each scan is slightly different and the end result shows
> where everything was pasted....AND it takes too darn long ... AND it
> doesn't look very good. Is there a better way? I suppose I could
> make a contact print and scan that and I might have a little bit
> better result. Thanks in advance! -Marcy

If your scanner can handle 5x7 film, why don't you scan in the 7 inch
direction?

You don't mention what type of scanner you have. If your scann is
supported, you might want to try Vuescan.

    <URL:http://www.hamrick.com/>

One of its features is to allow you to lock the scanner exposure after
previewing part of the roll. That should make it a bit easier to
stitch the parts back together. If you overlap the scans a bit, you
might be alble to use panorama stitching software to rejoin the scans
into one image.

-- 
Brian Reynolds                  | "It's just like flying a spaceship.
reynolds@panix.com              |  You push some buttons and see
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan
NAR# 54438                      |  
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Mar 1 08:05:37 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:00 PST