George L Smyth wrote:
> Bob -
>
> I have done it, but gave up in favor of using halftone film, which is
> as inexpensive as paper and (IMO) works much better. The exposure
> time will be considerably longer, which is something I did not want
> to deal with since I use a UV unit that I built (which is slower than
> the sun, though consistent). There are ways of stripping the back of
> the paper to compensate for this, but again, I found that ortho simply
> made things a whole lot easier.
I've heard about this pealing of the paper and also waxing and other
methods; always seemed like a fudge to me. I'll have to have a look
around and see if I can get hold of this ortho film stuff, although
I would be a bit worried about processing it and I've never processed
sheet film before.
> The density will need to be akin to what you would be using if you
> were shooting for a grade 0 paper.
So that would be a short contrast range rather than a high range...? Is
there anything you did to achieve that...? I'm not that up on shooting
for a particular density, I just point, shoot and hope for the best
normally.
Cheers,
-- Bob http://www.bobarnott.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Lager is an imitation Continental beer drunk only by refined ladies, people with digestive ailments, tourists, and other weaklings." - Munchen Süddeutsche Zeitung _______________________________________________ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML pinhole-discussion mailing list pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.htmlReceived on Fri Jan 7 02:17:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 31 Jan 2006 - 02:01:00 PST