Re: Standard photographic paper sizes?

Andy Schmitt wrote:

>The undersized cards more easily jam the automatic address coders &
>readers.. 8o)
>andy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
>[mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org] On Behalf Of Murray Leshner
>Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 8:59 AM
>To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
>Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Standard photographic paper sizes?
>
>
>USPS also complains about undersized and certain
>aspect ratios too.
>
>A counter clerk should be able to show you and
>possibly provide you with a template that graphically illustrates the
>pass/fail criteria for different postal rates.
>
>Murray
>
Long live the Royal English Post! Just got a card from Mort Marsh with
the extraordinary size of 9,5 x 2,4 inch without any problems
taco

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Dec 14 07:26:26 2004