RE: Digital Negatives?

Mark Nelson's new e-book addressses this issue very well by all reports:
have a look at www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com - I am getting it as
soon as I can afford it.

Kate

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
[mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org] On Behalf Of George L
Smyth
Sent: Monday, 13 December 2004 8:22 a.m.
To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital Negatives?

Kate -

Thanks for the answer. Another thing that I am going to test is the
possibility that colors other than black may be more effective in the
making of a digital negative.

Cheers -

george

-----
http://www.GLSmyth.com
http://DRiPInvesting.org

 --- On Sat 12/11, Kate Mahoney < honeyk@paradise.net.nz > wrote:
From: Kate Mahoney [mailto: honeyk@paradise.net.nz]
To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 11:42:08 +1300
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital Negatives?

I am using the standard dye based inkset that comes with the C400UX
printer<br>I use, always printing in colour and using the setting for
"gloss photo<br>paper". I don't need to print any more densely than 720
dpi, as the denser<br>settings just slown up the printer and don't make
any substantial difference<br>to the gum printing time. As I'm a
student, I have to conserve my resources.<br><br>Kate<br>----- Original
Message -----<br>From: "George L Smyth" <glsmyth@myway.com><br>To:
<pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org><br>Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004
5:00 PM<br>Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital
Negatives?<br><br><br>><br>> Kate -<br>><br>> Are you using pigmented
ink? I have not been able to get enough density<br>with my ink jet
printer.<br>><br>> Cheers -<br>><br>> george<br>><br>> -----<br>>
http://www.GLSmyth.com<br>> http://DRiPInvesting.org<br>><br>> --- On
Fri 12/10, Kate Mahoney < honeyk@paradise.net.nz > wrote:<br>> From:
Kate Mahoney [mailto: honeyk@paradise! .net.nz]<br>> To:
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org<br>> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:19:21
+1300<br>> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital
Negatives?<br>><br>> You can check out my prints made with diginegs
(again based on<br>Dan's<br>process)
at<br>http://www.katemahoneyphoto.co.nz/gumfront.html<br>-----
Original<br>Message -----<br>From: "Dan Gerber"
<dgerber@adobe.com><br>To:<br><pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org><br>Sent:
Saturday, December 11, 2004 1:02<br>PM<br>Subject: Re:
[pinhole-discussion] Digital
Negatives?<br><br><br>><br>Murray,<br>><br>> The digital negative stuff
I've done so far (I've just<br>started doing this)<br>> is based on Dan
Burkholder's process he details in<br>his book "Making<br>Digital<br>>
Negatives for Contact Printing" I'm<br>printing onto transparency
material<br>with<br>> my inkjet printer. Scans of<br>prints look just
like prints made with<br>> traditional negatives.<br>><br>><br>You can
check out Dan's process at his site:<br>><br>><br>http:!
//www.danburkholder.com/<br>><br>> Hope this
helps,<br>><br>Dan<br>><br>><br>> On 12/10/04 5:43 PM, "Murray
Leshner"<br><murrayatuptowngallery@yahoo.com><br>> wrote:<br>><br>> >
Intrigued, I was<br>going to !<br>> ask if anyone had any images<br>> >
scanned of prints made from digital<br>negatives in part<br>> > because
I'm still confused whether one prints<br>(inkjet<br>> > or toner!?!) to
a transparency, or is it some other<br>> ><br>process.<br>> ><br>> > But
if there is nothing particularly different<br>about<br>> > them,
especially on a computer monitor, no need (just<br>> ><br>tell me).<br>>
><br>> > Thanks<br>> ><br>> > Murray<br>> ><br>> ><br>><br>><br>> >
__________________________________<br>> > Do you Yahoo!?<br>>
><br>Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.<br>>
><br>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail<br>>
><br>_______________________________________________<br>> > Post to the
list as<br>PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML<br>> > pinhole-discussion mailing
list! <br>> ><br>pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org<br>> > FAQ
at<br>http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html<br>><br>><br>____
___________________________________________<br>> Post to the list
as<br>PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML<br>> pinhole-discussion mailing !<br>>
list<br>> pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org<br>> FAQ
at<br>http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html<br>><br><br>_____
__________<br>________________________________<br>Post to the list as
PLAIN TEXT only - no<br>HTML<br>pinhole-discussion
mailing<br>list<br>pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org<br>FAQ
at<br>http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html<br><br>><br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> No banners. No
pop-ups. No kidding.<br>> Make My Way your home on the Web -
http://www.myway.com<br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> Post to the list as
PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML<br>> pinhole-discussion mailing list<br>>
pinhole-discussion_at_spitbite.org<br>> FAQ at http://spitbite.o!
rg/pinhole-discussion/list.html<br>><br><br>____________________________
___________________<br>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only -
 no HTML<br>pinhole-discussion mailing
list<br>pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org<br>FAQ at
http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html<br>

_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML pinhole-discussion mailing
list pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org FAQ at
http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.807 / Virus Database: 549 - Release Date: 7/12/2004
 
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.807 / Virus Database: 549 - Release Date: 7/12/2004
 
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html