Pinhole Digi-cam

From: Howard Wells <sandwell_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Thu 09 Dec 2004 - 11:14:00 PST

I've mounted pinholes on Nikon digital SLRs to good effect. The only major
problem is that the great depth of field of the tiny aperture causes any
grit or dust on the low-pass filter to become a prominent and unwanted
feature in the image. Dust and grit that does not show up in normal lensed
usage. Converting a digi-cam to pinhole might avoid the problem. Other than
that they are great for pinhole, offering the instant feedback I love so
much with Polaroid without reciprocity effects.

However, it does inject an element of guilt into the process, at least for
me, that my film box polaroids and other pinhole cameras don't produce. I'm
not a Luddite and the image is still being formed through a pinhole but. . .

Peace and Happy Holidays,

Howard Wells

> [Original Message]
> From: Doug Holt <mancer@verizon.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org>
> Date: 12/9/2004 1:31:15 PM
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] anti-newton ring glass
>
> Always more than one way to skin a cat... not that I ever wanted a
skinned
> cat around.
>
> I'm thinking the best thing to do is go to an all digital pinhole. I
wonder
> if anyone on this list has converted a digi-camera yet?

--- Howard Wells
--- sandwell@earthlink.net
--- hwells@artacademy.edu
--- home.earthlink.net/~sandwell
--- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hiw3/my_photos

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Thu Dec 9 11:14:08 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:00:24 PST