Re: Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179

From: Kate Mahoney <honeyk_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Wed 17 Nov 2004 - 01:20:58 PST

Hmmm aren't we kind??????
Kate
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Tom Miller
  To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
  Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:32 PM
  Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179

  Dear All,

  You are kind for not chewing me out for the mistake in this post. The flashing method I've described would bring out detail in highlights.

  Tom
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org [mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org]On Behalf Of Tom Miller
    Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:19 PM
    To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
    Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179

    Hi Taco,

    I haven't tried it myself, but did have it demonstrated to me: an exceedingly short flash onto an exposed image will bring out a little more shadow detail. I saw this done to a print from a lens negative and so have no idea whether it would work on a paper neg.

    Tom

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Wed Nov 17 01:20:55 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:00:24 PST