I do not think that there should be any difference between pre and post flashing. Remember, you are simply exposing the paper.
Cheers -
george
-----
http://www.GLSmyth.com
http://DRiPInvesting.org
--- On Tue 11/16, Wolfgang Thoma < taco@thoma.be > wrote:
From: Wolfgang Thoma [mailto: taco@thoma.be]
To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:56:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:JVCABACUS@aol.com">JVCABACUS@aol.com</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid30.65a785dd.2ecb9630@aol.com" type="cite"><font
face="arial,helvetica"><font ptsize="10" family="SANSSERIF"
face="Arial" lang="0" size="2">Thanks for the interest in pre-flashing
paper negatives. Lets see if I can sort out the questions: <br>
<br>
2) I haven't tried post-flashing, after the exposure. Not sure if it
would work, but its worth experimenting with.<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
</font></font></blockquote>
Shouldn't post-flashing result in a kind of solarisation effect?<br>
taco<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
<p>
_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Nov 16 17:05:14 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:00:24 PST