RE: Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179

From: Tom Miller <tomwmiller_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 16 Nov 2004 - 11:19:15 PST

Hi Taco,

I haven't tried it myself, but did have it demonstrated to me: an
exceedingly short flash onto an exposed image will bring out a little more
shadow detail. I saw this done to a print from a lens negative and so have
no idea whether it would work on a paper neg.

Tom
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
[mailto:owner-pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org]On Behalf Of Wolfgang Thoma
  Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:56 PM
  To: pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
  Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: pinhole-discussion-digest V1 #179

  JVCABACUS@aol.com wrote:

    Thanks for the interest in pre-flashing paper negatives. Lets see if I
can sort out the questions:

    2) I haven't tried post-flashing, after the exposure. Not sure if it
would work, but its worth experimenting with.

    Joe

  Shouldn't post-flashing result in a kind of solarisation effect?
  taco

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Tue Nov 16 11:20:07 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:00:24 PST