Re: Making pinholes without a darkroom?

Chuck Flagg wrote:
> I'll check out the website you mentioned and look into the
> "Readyload" more.

Paul Butzi has a really good article at:

    <URL:http://www.butzi.net/reviews/readyquick.htm>

I had meant to mention it before, but he hid it in the review section
of his web site instead of in the articles section.

Some people had problems with the old double sheet Readyload packets
he talks about, but these packets are no longer available (they were
replaced by the single sheet packets) and I haven't heard of people
having trouble with the new packets.

-- 
Brian Reynolds                  | "But in the new approach, as you know,
reynolds@panix.com              |  the important thing is to understand 
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what you're doing rather than to get
NAR# 54438                      |  the right answer." -- Tom Lehrer
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html