this is just me, but i'd avoid dry mounting
altogether. as a display device i just don't think its
very effective. if you're having the images framed you
can get whats called a floating mount on the matte
board. this means there will be no window matte, just
one sheet that the image is hinged to in the back. its
used often for drawings, prints and other types of
artwork on paper... most any framer should be able to
do it. you can do it yourself but it can be
tricky...hope this helps.
--- Tom Miller <tomwmiller@comcast.net> wrote: > Dear
All,
>
> I am considering displaying some full 11x14 pinhole
> images (no border around
> the image on the paper). The images would be matted
> and displayed behind
> glass. In order to not have the top mat cover any
> part of the image, I'm
> considering dry-mounting the images on museum board
> and cutting the top mat
> to slightly more than 11x14. So, a couple of
> questions.
>
> - Is dry mounting archival? The images are both RC
> and fiber and have been
> selenium toned.
> - Should the images be dry mounted on four-ply
> board, or would two-ply
> suffice?
>
> Any other bits of advice on dry-mounting are
> welcome. The collective wisdom
> and knowledge of this list is humbling and much
> appreciated.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> pinhole-discussion mailing list
> pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
> FAQ at
http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
pinhole-discussion mailing list
pinhole-discussion@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/pinhole-discussion/list.html
Received on Fri Mar 5 14:15:38 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:00:20 PST