Ian -
I'm not sure what you mean. Changing the size of the pinhole, without
question, changes the sharpness of the image, making it different, so niether
of your assertions are correct. Eric Renner's book displays this with a
series, and can tell you that this is the case from first-hand experience.
Cheers -
george
--- Ian McKee <photoian@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> I made two assertions; 1) that at a given extension you will get the same
> image regardless of pinhole size and 2) that the sharpness was the same for
> each image.
> I will stuck to the first and admit I'm on shakier ground on the second.
> I used TMax 100 4x5 film and shot a scenic, a saguaro cactus at about 25
> feet. Examining the negatives and proofs only with a loupe, they appeared
> to me to be of similar sharpness. Also, I will admit I didn't shoot the
> whole series of pinholes but only a sampling.
> I plane to redo the experiment with the whole series to see if I am
> mistaken.
> Regardless of the results, doing it is fun and enlightening!
>
>
> --- Ian McKee
> --- photoian@earthlink.net
> --- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
=====
Handmade Photographic Images - http://GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Wed Dec 18 12:31:41 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:50 PST