RE: Re: pinhole IR

that print is absolutely stunning! i love it!

so now i have to ask, you said you used and opaque IR filter? did you mount
it in front of the pinhole? or behind? i'm going to assume that you didn't
move it about in front of the pinhole if you rated the film at 3? it must
have been a lengthy exposure. please impart your knowledge.

i've recently crafted a pinholga myself, and i'm really interested in
trying this IR business.

congratulations on the wonderful image. and making a cyanotype was a great
idea.

cheers,

Steve

> [Original Message]
> From: ColdMarblePhoto <coldmarble@dgbn.com>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Date: 12/10/2002 11:15:19 PM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: pinhole IR
>
> on 12/10/02 , "Ed Nazarko" wrote:
>
> > I've been craving pinhole with infrared imaging capability, difficult
> > with Kodak now only producing 35mm infrared film.
>
> I've had fun with the Maco IR820 film which is available in 35mm, 120 and
> 4x5 (Yippee!) It's slow as my mind in the morning before coffee. I
usually
> rate it about 3 (the film, not my mind) and you will need an opaque IR
> filter such as a Wratten 87 or a Hoya R72. I just uploaded a cyanotype IR
> pinhole made with a pinHolga to the gallery.
>
>
http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=jhb_ir_c
> yano092902.jpg
>
> John Bolgiano
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/

--- Steve Bell
--- Veracity000@earthlink.net
--- "We have...become our own thought police; but instead of calling the
process by which we limit our own expression of
     dissent and wonder 'censorship', we call it 'concern for commercial
viability'." -David Mamet
Received on Tue Dec 10 23:30:42 2002