my last two pixels (it was wonderings)

From: luish m. coelho <luish_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 10 Dec 2002 - 15:40:21 PST

well, I am sorry too about so many messages per second.

------------------

Andy Schmitt wrote 'it's only a tool."
well, most of the time what we discuss here? our tools, isn't it?

meggan gould wrote:
"it is getting one's hands dirty, just in a different way."
thanks for your enlightment, meggan.

what differences are these is what I tried to discuss a bit, but it
seems I got myself all wrongly interpreted. excuse me if I sounded like
saying this is better than that, I never meant that. it is ridiculous.

I was just trying to say that pixels have a quite different nature than
silver cristals. they generate image through a totally new way and this
is worth a thinking. it is indeed just a tool, just another subject.
but it is a subject to me as much as a closeup pinhole camera or a
contact printing alt processs under acrylic/perspex/plexiglass, somehow
it manages to get more passion into it, hate and love.

at last, films, papers, wet plates are also highly technological
products, don't miss this point, please.

[]s
luish

Lisa Reddig wrote:

> Sorry, Sorry, Sorry
> We all should just stick our tongues out and say "my mommy's better than
> your mommy".
>
> The end
>
> Lisa
>
> my pinholes cooler than yours
Received on Tue Dec 10 15:38:58 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:50 PST