Re: digital wonderings

Lisa,

don't get me wrong. I may be a little excited about defending digital
processes, but I am also very much into 'traditional' pinhole.
what realy gets me into defending a more attention to what is happening
in the digital field is that pixels are a new way of magic (let's not be
naive and forget the powerful industry behind it, of course, trying to
set its new patterns, I find this even more stimulating. I heard Kodak
wants to terminate film pelicula for the movies in 2005? It may not be
true, but think about the enviroment impact our chemicals do).

I have nothing agaist old ways, it is not about that.
I believe it is about image, whatever path one chooses to walk to get
it, but I also believe that someone who works with it needs to know, to
care and to discuss the philosophical aspects, the enviromental aspects
and the human aspects os its choosen path.

yes, may we all be happy in our own little worlds, and how about
exchanging some thoughts?

how many people in this list have experienced REAL digital pinholing?
Not scanning paper or film but really creating images through a hole in
front of the CCD?
get the old mavica or some security camera take the lenses out and place
a little hole in front of it. thats what I mean by going digital.

[]s
luish

Lisa Reddig wrote:

>>Luish wrote: but I see that most of the people just don't get what digital
>>image is about yet.
>>
>
> Luish,
>
> Isn't it interesting that you think people don't understand what digital can
> do. But I, on the other side, doing nothing digital, feel like people have
> forgotten the pleasures of non digital.

> May we all be happy in our own little worlds.
>
> Lisa
Received on Tue Dec 10 12:53:33 2002