Re: Kodak Paper without Logos

FWIW, I've never seen the Kodak logo when contact printing their paper, so this
really isn't an issue one way or another.

Cheers -

george

--- Byron <pinhole@pinhole.org> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I used to do quite a lot of large paper negative work. I used Ilford
> papers, since they were one of the very few companies that did not print
> their logo on the back of their papers.
>
> Ilford papers come in a wide selection of surfaces. I found them to be
> most suitable for making large paper negatives and contact prints.
>
> One trick I used to experiment with was 'wet' contact printing. I would
> process the large paper negative and, being an impatient sort I would then
> wet (with water) a sheet of unexposed paper, I would then place them face
> to face (emulsion to emulsion) on a glass sheet and use a rubber squeegee
> to remove the air pockets. Once this was done I would expose to light and
> develop normally (after peeling the two apart again)
>
>
> Anyhow. Ilford.
>
> byron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/

=====
Handmade Photographic Images - http://GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Sun Dec 8 15:32:49 2002