Re: pinholes and film speed

From: Shannon Stoney <shannonstoney_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Fri 05 Jul 2002 - 21:27:01 PDT

Now I'm up to an ASA of 2100, and counting... I also had to increase
development time to about 12 minutes. Not sure if this will be the final
"normal" negative setting, but I think I'm getting close. This takes a lot
of experimentation!

--shannon

----------
>From: "G.Penate" <penate@rogers.com>
>To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinholes and film speed
>Date: Fri, Jul 5, 2002, 3:05 PM
>

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shannon Stoney" <shannonstoney@earthlink.net>
>
>> So, I guess it doesn't really matter WHY this is so, as long as I can figure
>> out HOW to make a negative that works for me.
>
> That's correct! My intention was not to over analize the WHY but to just
point
> to you there are so many variables involved an a minor "deviation" from all or
> several of them can easily account for the seeminly illogical at simple
> inspection result (to me at least).
>
> Guillermo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Fri Jul 5 21:25:22 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:45 PST