Re: [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print

From: Shannon Stoney <shannonstoney_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Wed 03 Jul 2002 - 17:36:25 PDT

I like this a lot too. I assume when you say Lith print, you mean you made
a lith negative to print it? What kind of print is it?

--shannon

----------
>From: "Andy Schmitt" <aschmitt@warwick.net>
>To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print
>Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2002, 2:08 PM
>

> I second the motion..Great!
> andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Andrew
> Amundsen
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:21 PM
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print
>
>
>>From: "Christian Harkness" <chris.harkness@eudoramail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just uploaded a new pinhole lith print. It's from a 35 mm negative done
>> with a pinhole body cap.
>>
>>
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=chri
> sharkness
>> .jpg
>>
>> chris
>
>
> Chris, very nice shot. What kind of exposure/shutter speed are you
> getting using a pinhole bodycap. Film speed and lighting conditions were
> what this day?
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Wed Jul 3 17:35:25 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:45 PST