I, too have been noodling this. I've had sucess with taking care of all of
the reciprocity corrections at the time of exposure. I process normal.
The whole thing about overexpose and under develop, or underexpose to over
develop never made sense to me as the conditions under which I shoot could
change mid-roll.
gregg mcneill
>Sorry to have a one track mind, but I am still thinking about whether you
>need to change your development times when you make long exposures. The
>theory seems to be that highlights expose more than shadows during long
>exposures, so that you should under-develop. But, when I do this the
>highlights look too dull. I am wondering if this "rule" is really true.
>What do other people on this list do? Do you develop less as you make
>longer exposures?
>
>--shannon
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Received on Mon Jun 24 09:57:16 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:45 PST