Re: pinhole is not about "sharpness"?

That is a heck of a good image, my idea of an ideal pinhole image, well
executed no matter what the apeture.

Mitch Guthrie

>From: ragowaring <ragowaring@btinternet.com>
>Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole is not about "sharpness"?
>Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:35:01 +0100
>
>
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 May 2002 09:51 pm, Michael_Georgoff@trendmicro.com wrote:
> >> Perhaps the majority of pinhole is not at all concerned with sharpness.
> >> There are many, many of what I consider Pictorial shooters, achieving
>great
> >> soft images, some very dreamlike. Very nice stuff! (eg: Davison's The
> >> Onion Field, etc, etc). The WWPD gallery is full of great, soft
>pinhole
> >> images.
> >
> >
> > I have had people who couldn't believe that some Finney pics I made
> > were actually pinhole, due to sharpness. Using the "correct" focal
>length and
> > aperature, I was able to get this amount of detail:
> >
> > http://hiddenworld.net:81/pinhole/?cmd=max&start=&pic=blackbeard.jpg
> >
> > I don't mind not having "razor" sharpness, but I like a certain level of
> > clarity...
>
>
>I like you picture Jeff
>
>
>Alexis
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>unsubscribe or change your account at
>http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Received on Wed May 8 13:43:17 2002