Re: piezography

I just wanted to second Alixis said, Piezo&MIS prints look great. For example
I was in a group show of night photographers in January, and we had a total
of 50 prints in the show (color and BW) with about 20 of the prints BW (10
silver and 10 were ink). No one noticed any quality difference and being
night photography, there were lots of dark tones in the images. Mark

>-- Original Message --
>Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] piezography
>From: ragowaring <ragowaring@btinternet.com>
>To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:09:19 +0000
>
>
>I use an Epson 2000P and am very pleased with it indeed. Used with a high
>quality paper the result is very worthwhile and the detail is.... well
if
>you want more detail then perhaps you need to stop using a magnifying glass
>to look at the pictures with. The archive quality means that I can present
>the prints without fear of the image deteriorating as long as they are
>treated like watercolours. There is now a wide range of papers available
>for inkjet suitable for most types of images and destinations. The cost
>per
>print is relatively high, but then this is reflected in the image quality
>which is high indeed, filling a gap between lithographic printing and the
>extremely expensive silk screen printing.
>It is ideal for pinhole photographs.
>
>Alexis
>
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>unsubscribe or change your account at
>http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Fri Mar 22 11:18:19 2002