Re: Combine new with old

From: ragowaring <ragowaring_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Fri 11 Jan 2002 - 21:02:49 PST

I agree with the file sizes Rob but you can get some fantastic archival
prints digitally. But this is another thing, perhaps publication
Alexis

on 11/1/02 5:28 pm, R Duarte at rahji@rahji.com wrote:

> good idea, but the photos will look pretty bad when printed unless they're
> scanned/uploaded/downloaded/printed at really high resolution (which means
> big file sizes). personally, i'd rather see silver prints in a gallery than
> printouts but maybe i'm just being a baby. :)
> rob
>
>> From: "Chris" <christo@worldnet.att.net>
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:15:14 -0600
>> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Combine new with old
>>
>> Instead of one set of travelling photos for the exhibition, why not upload
>> the photos then download and print them wherever anyone wants to mount an
>> exhibition? Combine old school with new school. I think that format is an
>> artisitc expression in itself. Has there ever been a simultaneous
>> multi-venue photo exhibition? This could be the first and to do it with
>> pinhole photographs would be the ultimate in irony.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>> unsubscribe or change your account at
>> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Fri Jan 11 15:27:16 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:18:42 PST