Re: A test of long exposures

From: Bill Erickson <erickson_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Sun 09 Dec 2001 - 06:50:06 PST

It was a clear night. I don't think the wondow was tinted. Portra film gets blusih with very long exposures. The monkey skull was by a window after sunset. Must have been some twilight plus street lights.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Tom Miller
  To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
  Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 9:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures

  Hi Bill,

  Excellent work!! Thanks for posting it. Naturally, they bring up questions, so hear they are:
  - Did any part of the overnight exposure overlap evening or dawn? Was it taken through a tinted window? Was is cloudy or snowy that night or was it a clear sky?
  - The parade photo is simply beautiful. Anything you want to say about it would be great.
  - For the monkey skull still life, was there any other light source besides the flashlight?

  Thanks again,
  Tom
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Bill Erickson
    To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
    Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:21 PM
    Subject: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures

    I uploaded three images which are the result of exposure times arrived at with less than microscopic precision. Specifically,
    http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/upload/overnight was just that, an overnight exposure.
    http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/upload/parade the exposure was "as long as it took for the float to pass me", and with http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/upload/deadbattery I taped a monkey skull to the end of a flashlight and exposed it until the battery went dead. It seems to be impossible to fatally overexpose something. All you get with more overexposure is better detail in the shadows.
Received on Sun Dec 9 06:48:50 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:31 PST