Re: Bellows factor

From: Colin Talcroft <ctalcroft_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Fri 30 Nov 2001 - 23:37:42 PST

That was my instinct, Guillermo, and thanks for your
answer.

Funny thing is, I tried it yesterday at a minute and a
half--my rough calculation, which was close to your
suggested 84.5 seconds--and it completely overexposed
the film. It was all white (using Polaroid Type 55).
Then I tried it indoors in a setting that I know from
experience needs about 45 minutes. I gave it about an
hour--very little more than what I would normally—and
the expoure was more or less correct. In other words,
it was behaving very much like the extension had no
effect at all. Wonder why?

Colin

> There is no "rule of thumb", just plain physics of
> light.
> This case is in no way different than if you were
> using a glass lens.
>
> > If I would expect a 2-second exposure outside in
> full
> > sunlight with a 5.0CM "focal length", for example,
> > what would be a theoretical equivalent at 32.5 CM?
>
> 84.5 seconds (uncorrected for reciprocity, time)
>
> Guillermo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com
Received on Fri Nov 30 23:34:43 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:30 PST