RE: 116 vs 616 film?

From: Andy Schmitt <aandy_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 13 Nov 2001 - 11:15:48 PST

I think it is a spindle problem...I went through my "box of antiquities"
(junk box according to others... & came up with a BRAND NEW ROLL of VP616!
It only went out of date in 1971. Though knowing verichrome pan, it's
probably still good....
I could let you have it for some princely sum befitting its worth... 8o)
Let me know off line what you think... k?
andy

-----Original Message-----
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Guy Glorieux
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Pinhole List
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] 116 vs 616 film?

Hi,

I know we had a discussion about the availabilty of 116 film recently.
However, I can't remember if this covered the question of 616 format vs
116 format.

I just discovered that I have a Kodak 616 folder with negative sizes 4
1/4 x 2 1/2 that is virtually new. Inside it says to use 616 format.
Can I put in 116 format or will I run into the same problems as 120 vs
620?

Thanks (and my apologies if this was already covered in the earlier
discussion).

Guy

_______________________________________________
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Tue Nov 13 10:30:54 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:29 PST