RE: Re: Zero Image 6x9

Hi,

I have had this problem twice in 6 rolls. I think that if if pay close
attention to the alignment during takeup then things are ok. This is not
something I can just do quickly (or I get the problem you mentioned).

Mark
mark@interwalk.com
http://www.interwalk.com/pinhole.htm

-- Original Message --

>Following the discussion of lens flare with the Zero Image 6x9 leads me
to
>relay a
>problem I have with my new 6x9. Film wound through the camera does not
wind
>tightly
>on the take-up spool. Film is so loose it sometimes binds and I cannot
wind
>the last
>few frames. Needless to say, loose winding leaves film edges open to light
>leaks.
>Anyone else experience this problem? If so, have you found a solution?
>
>David
>
>pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com wrote:
>
>> Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to
>> pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..."
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? (DAlfrey@aol.com)
>> 2. Who we are? (Guy Glorieux)
>> 3. Re: Who we are? (Jeff Dilcher)
>> 4. Re: Determining exposure beyond..................... (Bill Erickson)
>> 5. Who we are? (lva)
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 1
>> From: DAlfrey@aol.com
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:03:06 EDT
>> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9?
>> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> In a message dated 9/17/01 9:30:55 AM Central Daylight Time,
>> root@hiddenworld.net writes:
>>
>> << I think they mean "internal" reflection. Does anyone know
>> if the newer cameras are less susceptible to flare?
>> >>
>> I have a Zero Image Multi Format which allows for 6cmX9cm images and
have
>> exposed films in the 6cmX9cm mode, and never had any problems with flare
>.I
>> purchased my camera in the early part of 2001 .
>> Hope this may be of help .
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:57:57 -0400
>> From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@sympatico.ca>
>> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> Hey, Gregg!
>>
>> If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
>> on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
>> permanently? Just a thought...
>>
>> Guy
>> "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women"
>>
>> P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments...
>> Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at
>> http://www.pinholevisions.org/exhibits/Glorieux/
>>
>> ...-;) -:)
>>
>> P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days...
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:18:54 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: Jeff Dilcher <root@hiddenworld.net>
>> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> I like that idea.
>> I'll include an ascii art self portrait of myself...
>>
>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Guy Glorieux wrote:
>>
>> > Hey, Gregg!
>> >
>> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
>> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
>> > permanently? Just a thought...
>> >
>> > Guy
>> > "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women"
>> >
>> > P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments...
>> > Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at
>> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/exhibits/Glorieux/
>> >
>> > ...-;) -:)
>> >
>> > P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days...
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>> > unsubscribe or change your account at
>> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>> >
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 4
>> From: "Bill Erickson" <erickson@hickorytech.net>
>> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure beyond.....................
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:19:21 -0500
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> I've had no experience with ilford HP%, and each BW film has it's own
>> requirement. my general advice is expose longer than you think necessary
>> and it'll probably be OK. The reciprocity failure you're trying to
>> compensate for in fact buffers the overexposure error.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rune Tallaksen" <tallaks@alfanett.no>
>> To: "Pinhole-Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:01 AM
>> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure
>> beyond.....................
>>
>> > Hi list!
>> >
>> > Can anybody help me with how to determine exposure when correcting
for
>> > resiprosity failure when the measured esposuretime exceeds that of
the
>> table
>> > from the filmvendor?
>> >
>> > For instance when using Ilford HP5 Plus, the film data sheet gives
the
>> added
>> > time for resiprosity failure until initial measured 35 secs(corrected
>for
>> > pinhole f stop). How can I calculate the "correct" exposure time beyond
>> this
>> > point? Tiral and error until now has not been satisfactory for me.
>> >
>> > Any help will be appreciated.
>> >
>> > Rune
>> > Norway
>> >
>> > __\/__
>> > ./ ^ _ \.
>> > |\|(o)(o)|/|
>> > #------------------.OOOo--oo--oOOO.--------------------#
>> > # Rune Tallaksen #
>> > # #
>> > # #
>> > #---------------------------Oooo.----------------------#
>> > .oooO ( )
>> > ( ) )/
>> > \( (_/
>> > \_)
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>> > unsubscribe or change your account at
>> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>> >
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:23 +0200
>> From: "lva" <lva@pamho.net>
>> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
>> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>>
>> > Hey, Gregg!
>> >
>> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
>> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
>> > permanently? Just a thought...
>>
>> Pictures of the members of the list would also be great. When I read
a
>> good post, I always wonder how the person looks like who's written the
>> text.
>>
>> Greetings from Sweden
>>
>> Brahma
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>>
>> End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>unsubscribe or change your account at
>http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>
Received on Mon Sep 17 17:00:51 2001