Following the discussion of lens flare with the Zero Image 6x9 leads me to relay a
problem I have with my new 6x9. Film wound through the camera does not wind tightly
on the take-up spool. Film is so loose it sometimes binds and I cannot wind the last
few frames. Needless to say, loose winding leaves film edges open to light leaks.
Anyone else experience this problem? If so, have you found a solution?
David
pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com wrote:
> Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to
> pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? (DAlfrey@aol.com)
> 2. Who we are? (Guy Glorieux)
> 3. Re: Who we are? (Jeff Dilcher)
> 4. Re: Determining exposure beyond..................... (Bill Erickson)
> 5. Who we are? (lva)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: DAlfrey@aol.com
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:03:06 EDT
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9?
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> In a message dated 9/17/01 9:30:55 AM Central Daylight Time,
> root@hiddenworld.net writes:
>
> << I think they mean "internal" reflection. Does anyone know
> if the newer cameras are less susceptible to flare?
> >>
> I have a Zero Image Multi Format which allows for 6cmX9cm images and have
> exposed films in the 6cmX9cm mode, and never had any problems with flare .I
> purchased my camera in the early part of 2001 .
> Hope this may be of help .
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:57:57 -0400
> From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@sympatico.ca>
> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Hey, Gregg!
>
> If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
> on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
> permanently? Just a thought...
>
> Guy
> "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women"
>
> P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments...
> Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/exhibits/Glorieux/
>
> ...-;) -:)
>
> P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days...
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:18:54 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Jeff Dilcher <root@hiddenworld.net>
> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I like that idea.
> I'll include an ascii art self portrait of myself...
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Guy Glorieux wrote:
>
> > Hey, Gregg!
> >
> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
> > permanently? Just a thought...
> >
> > Guy
> > "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women"
> >
> > P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments...
> > Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at
> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/exhibits/Glorieux/
> >
> > ...-;) -:)
> >
> > P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Bill Erickson" <erickson@hickorytech.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure beyond.....................
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:19:21 -0500
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I've had no experience with ilford HP%, and each BW film has it's own
> requirement. my general advice is expose longer than you think necessary
> and it'll probably be OK. The reciprocity failure you're trying to
> compensate for in fact buffers the overexposure error.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rune Tallaksen" <tallaks@alfanett.no>
> To: "Pinhole-Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:01 AM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure
> beyond.....................
>
> > Hi list!
> >
> > Can anybody help me with how to determine exposure when correcting for
> > resiprosity failure when the measured esposuretime exceeds that of the
> table
> > from the filmvendor?
> >
> > For instance when using Ilford HP5 Plus, the film data sheet gives the
> added
> > time for resiprosity failure until initial measured 35 secs(corrected for
> > pinhole f stop). How can I calculate the "correct" exposure time beyond
> this
> > point? Tiral and error until now has not been satisfactory for me.
> >
> > Any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > Rune
> > Norway
> >
> > __\/__
> > ./ ^ _ \.
> > |\|(o)(o)|/|
> > #------------------.OOOo--oo--oOOO.--------------------#
> > # Rune Tallaksen #
> > # #
> > # #
> > #---------------------------Oooo.----------------------#
> > .oooO ( )
> > ( ) )/
> > \( (_/
> > \_)
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:23 +0200
> From: "lva" <lva@pamho.net>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are?
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> > Hey, Gregg!
> >
> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space
> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more
> > permanently? Just a thought...
>
> Pictures of the members of the list would also be great. When I read a
> good post, I always wonder how the person looks like who's written the
> text.
>
> Greetings from Sweden
>
> Brahma
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>
> End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest
Received on Mon Sep 17 16:44:15 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:25 PST