interesting...I've had so many people in other newsgroups berate the
combination...
I'll have to give it a try..
thanks
andy
-----Original Message-----
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Colin Talcroft
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:22 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
I use the Polaroid 545 back with the Kodak Ready Loads
all the time with great success. They are very easy to
use. I don't know what range of films is available in
the Ready Load format, but I use the T-Max 100
version. They come in boxes of ten with two sheets in
each. You expose one side, remove it and then turn it
over to use the other side--much like a traditional
film holder. I was surprised to see someone here say
that people say they have trouble with them. The only
difficult thing is that removing them from the holder
is sometimes difficult, but I find the Polaroid films
difficult to remove too (removing them without putting
them through the built-in processing rollers). In
fact, I have ruined more Polaroid film doing this than
I have the Ready Loads. I recommend them if you can
afford the extra expense. The per-sheet cost of the
film will be higher than if you loaded sheet film into
ordinary holders.
Colin
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
Received on Mon Aug 27 14:32:47 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:24 PST