Re: questions & comments

From: William Erickson <erickson_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Fri 17 Aug 2001 - 05:58:40 PDT

My standard, sincere, reply to questions about '"will it work?" is "try it'. Pinhole is not primarily about sharp anyway, depth of field issues aside. You may especially like soft, glowing color pinhole images.

. ----- Original Message -----
  From: MVDtemporary@aol.com
  To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
  Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:49 PM
  Subject: [pinhole-discussion] questions & comments

  Hello:

  Excuse me if I already asked this - if I did, I forgot the replies already
  (but I don't think I did).

  Oh, firstly, apologies for the html forwarding garbage characters...I don't
  think AOL software lets one too picky about how they do things.

  I am a little confused, perhaps only by my expectations. I have picked up on
  the concept that pinhole gives phenomenal (am I overenthusiastic?)
  depth-of-field due to the typically large f-stops attained by usual camera
  designs.

  BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by anything
  larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
  pinhole images are "not very sharp".

  Is this just anecdotal advice from people who simply poked a hole without
  consideration of all the things that play a role....(that wasn't supposed to
  rhyme, it was an accident)? (Optimal hole diameter/focal length, thickness
  and roundness of pinhole material and resultant hole, etc.)

  We have a few of those color xerography transfers from a local
  photographer...I'm sure technique, patience and materials play a role...she
  hasn't been happy with all color copy machine or their operators
  (copy-jockies?)...some are interesting, some
  are 'lame'.

  She won't tell us what solvents she uses.

  Maybe I could try that with my first pinhole roll which is color...what
  chance do I have of lucking out and getting accurate color as a pinhole
  beginner anyway, so why not experiment?

  Murray (local ISP and 'normal' e-mail address still suffering technical
  difficulties - I feel sorry for them - down a week, so you know they're
  catching grief!)

  Murray

  Thanks

  Murray
Received on Fri Aug 17 09:02:50 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:24 PST