Re: Re: Pinhole-Discussion digest, Vol 1 #400 - 16 msgs

From: Edward Meyers <aghalide_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Thu 02 Aug 2001 - 20:23:59 PDT

Although the packaged chemicals might not be around, the individual
chemicals will be. Just mix your own....if you're here 50 years from now.
Ed

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, HypoBob wrote:

> >
>
> Guillermo,
>
> You have the kind of wonderfully twisted mind that is an asset in pinhole photograhpy. However, I think Skip has a point -- there may not be any B&W processing chemicals around in 50 to 100 years, so
> you had better leave a bottle of Rodinal down there too ;-) .
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> > Message: 14
> > From: "Guillermo" <penate@home.com>
> > To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Storage of unprocessed photo paper negatives
> > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 20:23:55 -0400
> > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> >
> > All this "talk" makes me want to expose some B&W film, leave it in the =
> > pinhole camera and store it away in my crawling space, which happens to =
> > be dark, dry and cool. I'd also add some information about the pinhole =
> > "technology". Hopefully some descendant of mine would find the film =
> > after I am gone, process it and get a nice surprise!!
> >
> > I don't know if people did store the camera/film on purpose, but I =
> > don't see anything wrong in doing it purposely, it'll be like a time =
> > capsule.......I think I will do it!
> >
> > Guillermo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>
Received on Thu Aug 2 23:24:00 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:24 PST