Re: scanner and darkroom

From: Gordon J. Holtslander <holtsg_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Sat 21 Jul 2001 - 22:27:07 PDT

Hi again:

The first question should be what are you going to do with the scanner?

If you simply want something to scan images to put on web pages you can
use a fairly inexpensive one.

If you want to use it for some kind of digitally based reproduction
you need to consider what kind of resultion you need. A high resolution
scanner costs more. How much more? How much resolution do you need?

On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 Dibassin@aol.com wrote:

> I am in the process of constructing space for myself to work within. The
> space consists of time (less work), which is my problem to solve alone, but
> also a physical environment in which I can allow myself to really immerse in
> pinhole. I have been following the discussions regarding dark-light rooms or
> wet-dry rooms and have decidied to slowly allow the space for both. I was
> wondering if anyone could suggest a place to look for "plans" to construct
> (lay-out) either or both in one room. I tend to be a "build as you need
> person" but my partner (and main contractor) is looking for structure. Also
> any suggestions for a good scanner which will take 120 film and hopefully
> soon 4x5. I know there is a huge range in quality and price . Thanks much
> Donna Bassin
> I just returned from Egypt and perhaps will be able to post some images as
> soon as I learn how.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
>

---------------------------------------------------------
Gordon J. Holtslander Dept. of Biology
holtsg@duke.usask.ca 112 Science Place
http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsg University of Saskatchewan
Tel (306) 966-4433 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Fax (306) 966-4461 Canada S7N 5E2
---------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jul 22 01:27:09 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:23 PST