hmm...I have checked multiple browsers and platforms
and my html.
try
http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pin6.jpg
for the last one.
Thanks
Johanna
--- Philip Lean <phillean@interact.net.au> wrote:
> Johanna
>
> this image is not showing on the web page
>
> pin6.jpg
>
>
> I am keen to see how they all worked out
>
> phil
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Johanna Zamora" <jjjulep@yahoo.com>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:16 AM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] First Pinhole Pix
>
>
> > Hello,
> > I am back and guess what? I did it...kind of
> > amazing...kind of a math test, but I did it.
> > I used aluminum can as as sheeting. Made a .19mm
> hole
> > for a 50mm focal length (close to optimum of
> .25mm).
> > I also used the scanner method of measuring
> (groovy!)
> > and the Goop cement (goopy) to achieve my pinhole
> body
> > cap.
> > I figured f/256 and based on sunny 16 I hold the
> > shutter open for 2.5 seconds for my 200 speed
> film. I
> > finished up a roll of velvia I was trying out and
> I am
> > sure I did not do justice to the film. (At least
> > compared to some lusher looking images I took with
> my
> > lens.)
> > So, I picked the sunny day to try out around the
> > neighborhood. I went to the Grand Army of the
> Republic
> > Cemetery. I swear some of the pictures look like
> my
> > grandmother could have taken them! (in more ways
> than
> > one!!!)
> >
> > If you want to see the results the are at:
> > http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pinhole.html
> >
> > Out of 14 I found that 6 were even worth scanning
> for
> > learning purposes.
> >
> > Big surprises:
> >
> > That any of them came out! Only one picture didn't
> > come out, and I just didn't hold the shutter open
> long
> > enough.
> >
> > That the math worked. To a degree. Thanks
> Guillermo!
> >
> > That my film is too small for the image.
> >
> > That I could not really see what I was pointing
> at.
> > Which considering the w i d e angle I was
> thinking
> > I would get, was a disappointment.
> > So the image is, as suggested to me earlier not as
> big
> > as I'd hoped or could be...time to work on a
> pinhole
> > cover for the beater kodak I found.
> >
> > I have never had "aluminum can" flare before and
> found
> > it the best surprise of all. The best I could do
> was
> > a black portion of a coke can. Thinking that
> would be
> > enough. No. Must purchase some black enamel.
> >
> > These pictures look very old. Nice, but the
> exposure
> > times are still something I am chasing around.
> >
> > There is a need to keep a spirit level on my
> camera
> > because I sure could not tell what is
> perpendicular or
> > not.
> >
> > All advice, criticism heartily welcomed. On list
> or
> > off, I am feeling like Tantalus right now...so
> > close...and yet so far - to getting it right!
> >
> > Thanks all for the inspiration and assistance!!!
> > Johanna
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinholevisions.org/discussion/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Wed Jul 11 17:16:18 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:23 PST