For every beautiful digital image/print there will be 1,000 crappy ones, the
same as with any other photographic medium, silver based, platinum, gum,
cyano, you name it...
It's the photographer's vision that makes a 'good' or 'bad/banal' photo, and
of course, one persons wow! is another's yuk!
Tina
>From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@sympatico.ca>
>Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
>Subject: [pinhole-discussion] More Food for toughts [Fwd: Arnold Gassan
>reported to have died]
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:58:15 -0400
>
>Hi everybody,
>
>Here is more food for thoughts about the debate over digital printing.
>The late Arnorld Gossen has used the digital medium in his late years
>quite extensively, as witenessed in his web site at
>http://www.agdigitalprints.com/
>
>As for me, I am quite indifferent about the issue altough I use the
>computer a lot as a tool to previsualize what I can expect to get in the
>darkroom. I've moved recently to Lith printing in the darkroom on fiber
>paper, but if for some reason the digital medium proves more convenient
>to achieve my goal from a viual standpoint, I'll move there with no
>hesitation...
>
>Cheers, -:))
>
>Guy
><< message3.txt >>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Received on Thu Jun 28 18:38:05 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:22 PST