Re: intro

Mike,

Thanks for the comments. I'll give some thought to making the web site easier
to get into.

I do have a (possibly perverse) desire to make elements in my pinhole photos
as sharp as I can.

Joe

Mike Vande Bunt wrote:

> Joe Huck wrote:
>
> > I'm now (at mid-life) in the process of starting a new career in fine
> > arts. My web site ( http://www.io.com/~joehuck/ ) is pretty much
> > dedicated to this effort, but has a section on lensless photography.
> > Please check it out if you're interested. I'd love to get some feedback.
>
> Beautiful pinhole photos. (Though I must question the ourpose of
> making the main entrance an intelligence test; I would have set it up
> so that a ckick anywhere on the page would advance the visitor to
> the intro page. . . )
>
> Except for the (fabulous!) panorama, I would not have identified any
> of the shots as being pinhole. Many people are very happy when
> their pinhole photos turn out sharp. My personal choice is to have
> my pinhole shots be distinctly different from lens shots, but that's
> my personal choice. (And I admit that several of your pinhole shots
> could only be duplicated with a rather expensive glass ultrawide
> angle lens, which I am fortunate enough to own . . . )
>
> Ultimately, though, the photo that results is more important than
> the equipment used to shoot it. If the viewer looks at the photo
> and says "Wow! that's a great photo." then the photo is a success.
> What matters most is not how the photo was taken, but THAT
> the photo was taken.
>
> Mike Vande Bunt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
Received on Wed May 30 10:32:43 2001