Re: Pinhole-Discussion digest, Vol 1 #319 - 9 msgs

I posted this question on the darkroom news group to no avail, but since it involves pinhole
photography I probably should have tried this august group first.

I am making a pinhole camera to use 4x5 sheet film and thought that Tri X in Rodinal may be
interesting. However I can't find any data on this combination. Any suggestions??

Bob
#94

Hi Bob,

I have been shooting Agfa 400 sheet film in my pinhole (Leonardo) camera and developing it
Rodinal 1:25 for 6 minutes with great results. I tend to overexpose the negatives (probably
rating the film 200 if I took light meter readings which I don't--it's more by the seat of my
pants guessing). I have shot about 50 sheets this way and I love the negatives. I develop six
at a time in 5 x 7 trays, agitating for fifteen seconds, then moving the bottom one to the top,
agitating again, etc. The negatives are very sharp and enlarge well to 11 x 14. Good luck.

Janet Neuhauser

pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com wrote:

> Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to
> pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: new to the group New Jerseyan (gina)
> 2. RE: Re: new to the group New Jerseyan (Andy Schmitt)
> 3. pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com (Gregg Kemp)
> 4. Re: pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com (B2MYOUNG@aol.com)
> 5. Tri X in Rodinal (HypoBob)
> 6. Re: Tri X in Rodinal (Benno Jones)
> 7. Re: pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com (Dieter Bublitz)
> 8. Re: pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com (Kosinski Family)
> 9. Re: Tri X in Rodinal (Kosinski Family)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "gina" <ginabell@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:19:28 -0400
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: new to the group New Jerseyan
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Hi Andy and other fellow NJ-ans,
>
> Have any of the Jersey pinholers met? Might be fun to get together if we
> arent too spread out.
> My serious pinhole experiments began about 5 years ago, but in second grade
> (mid 60's) our class made pinhole cameras out of our little milk cartons
> from the lunch room. Does that count?
> :0)
>
> It was so long ago but I remember being intrigued and mystified. Still get
> the same feelings today about pinhole photography.
>
> I use some homemade oatmeal box cameras, a zero 2000 & the beseler cardboard
> kit camera for 120 film, & a pinhole body cap for my canon ae1. There are
> some examples of my pinhole and other photography-based art on my website
>
> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~ginabell/index.html
>
> Pinhole visions is a new disovery for me and a fantastic resource for
> information and support!
>
> Gina Bellando
> New Jersey USA
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "Andy Schmitt" <aschmitt@warwick.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: new to the group New Jerseyan
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:32:45 -0400
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Nope, not that I'm aware of....would be fun though
> Three trees looks very much like one I did last year. Very Nice...
>
> Still Life With Moon and Star is really nice...good work...
> andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of gina
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:19 PM
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: new to the group New Jerseyan
>
> Hi Andy and other fellow NJ-ans,
>
> Have any of the Jersey pinholers met? Might be fun to get together if we
> arent too spread out.
> My serious pinhole experiments began about 5 years ago, but in second grade
> (mid 60's) our class made pinhole cameras out of our little milk cartons
> from the lunch room. Does that count?
> :0)
>
> It was so long ago but I remember being intrigued and mystified. Still get
> the same feelings today about pinhole photography.
>
> I use some homemade oatmeal box cameras, a zero 2000 & the beseler cardboard
> kit camera for 120 film, & a pinhole body cap for my canon ae1. There are
> some examples of my pinhole and other photography-based art on my website
>
> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~ginabell/index.html
>
> Pinhole visions is a new disovery for me and a fantastic resource for
> information and support!
>
> Gina Bellando
> New Jersey USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:52:42 -0400
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> From: Gregg Kemp <gregg.kemp@pinhole.com>
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Mr. Ron Hughes has taken his campaign to form a new pinhole photography web
> ring to a new high, by adding his spam to guest books at pinhole visions
> exhibits. I encourage everyone to boycott his web site and to NOT join his
> web ring. Mr. Hughes has yet to reply to anyone asking him what his
> purpose is in starting a new pinhole photography web ring. It appears that
> since he has started several web rings, his purpose is solely to generated
> income from click-through advertising.
>
> I will not print his web site here, but I encourage you to delete or ignore
> any mail coming from the rude Ron Hughes (email) rdh7846@cs.com.
>
> Gregg
>
> _____________________________________________________
> Pinhole Visions at http://www.pinholevisions.org
> Worldwide Pinhole Photograhy Day at http://www.pinholeday.org
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: B2MYOUNG@aol.com
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 17:32:21 EDT
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Thank you for the warning.
> I haven't heard from him yet...
> but...
> will be wary.
> Best,
> leezy
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:14:13 -0700
> From: HypoBob <hypobob@pacbell.net>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Organization: Not so's you could tell it.
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Tri X in Rodinal
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I posted this question on the darkroom news group to no avail, but since it involves pinhole
> photography I probably should have tried this august group first.
>
> I am making a pinhole camera to use 4x5 sheet film and thought that Tri X in Rodinal may be
> interesting. However I can't find any data on this combination. Any suggestions??
>
> Bob
> #94
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:09:22 -0700
> From: Benno Jones <quix@nomail.hotmail.com>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Tri X in Rodinal
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I happen to have the tech sheet that comes in the Rodinal package right
> in front of me and for Tri-X it recommends 7 minutes for 1+25 and 12
> minutes for 1+50. I believe these times are for small tank roll film
> development, however. Have you looked on the Agfa website? I know more
> in-depth data sheets are available for download there:
>
> http://www.agfaphoto.com/
>
> Good luck!
>
> Benno Jones
>
> HypoBob wrote:
> >
> > I posted this question on the darkroom news group to no avail, but since it involves pinhole
> > photography I probably should have tried this august group first.
> >
> > I am making a pinhole camera to use 4x5 sheet film and thought that Tri X in Rodinal may be
> > interesting. However I can't find any data on this combination. Any suggestions??
> >
> > Bob
> > #94
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: Dieter Bublitz <Dieter.Bublitz@bingo-ev.de>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 07:39:13 +0200
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Gregg Kemp <gregg.kemp@pinhole.com> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Ron Hughes has taken his campaign to form a new pinhole photography =
> web=20
> >ring to a new high, by adding his spam to guest books at pinhole visions=
> =20
> >exhibits. I encourage everyone to boycott his web site and to NOT join =
> his=20
>
> He, too, is searching the net for pinhole related websites and
> inviting the site-owners by mail to his webring.
> I know of two pinholers who received such a mail. And he is somewhat
> successfull. There are now 11 sites in the ring ...
>
> Dieter
>
> --=20
> Dieter's Lochkamera Seite: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/
> 1. weltweiter Tag der Lochkamerafotografie: http://www.pinholeday.org
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: "Kosinski Family" <zinski@telenet.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:18:22 -0400
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Ron contacted me to exchange links, but I can't do that with my 1 page site
> from Network Solutions... suggested he wait until I get a proper site before
> we proceed any further... all for the best, it seems.
> Jim K
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dieter Bublitz" <Dieter.Bublitz@bingo-ev.de>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole spammer rdh7846@cs.com
>
> > Gregg Kemp <gregg.kemp@pinhole.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Mr. Ron Hughes has taken his campaign to form a new pinhole photography
> web
> > >ring to a new high, by adding his spam to guest books at pinhole visions
> > >exhibits. I encourage everyone to boycott his web site and to NOT join
> his
> >
> > He, too, is searching the net for pinhole related websites and
> > inviting the site-owners by mail to his webring.
> > I know of two pinholers who received such a mail. And he is somewhat
> > successfull. There are now 11 sites in the ring ...
> >
> > Dieter
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dieter's Lochkamera Seite: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/
> > 1. weltweiter Tag der Lochkamerafotografie: http://www.pinholeday.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Kosinski Family" <zinski@telenet.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Tri X in Rodinal
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:25:54 -0400
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Everyone should bookmark Jon Mided's awesome development chart:
> http://www.digitaltruth.com/photo/devchart.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "HypoBob" <hypobob@pacbell.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:14 AM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Tri X in Rodinal
>
> > I posted this question on the darkroom news group to no avail, but since
> it involves pinhole
> > photography I probably should have tried this august group first.
> >
> > I am making a pinhole camera to use 4x5 sheet film and thought that Tri X
> in Rodinal may be
> > interesting. However I can't find any data on this combination. Any
> suggestions??
> >
> > Bob
> > #94
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest
Received on Wed May 16 20:11:37 2001