Guy Glorieux wrote:
> I don't have a "standard" print of the "lith" print I posted yesterday. But I
> just posted a "lith" print of a pinhole image I had already uploaded earlier
> this year on the gallery (Rose in winter).
>
> To see the difference, check:
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/lithroselr.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/roseinwinter2.jpg
>
Yes, I've seen the long prints on your site. That's a neat concept for
the camera. The 2 versions of Rose in Winter are a great example of
the differences (along with your description of what didn't make it through
the scanning process). Both prints are nice, but there is a special
character to the lith print that I really like. It makes me wish I had room
for a darkroom!
Mike
Received on Tue Apr 3 00:46:45 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:33:20 PST
