Beautiful self portraits and lovely--the first portrait is really stunning.
--Diana
pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com wrote:
> Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to
> pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pinhole-discussion-request@pinhole.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. reciprocity failure with paper negaties. (William Erickson)
> 2. cracker images (William Erickson)
> 3. Re: cracker images (Katharine Thayer)
> 4. RE: cracker images (Andy Schmitt)
> 5. RE: cracker images (Andy Schmitt)
> 6. RE: cracker images (Michael Keller)
> 7. RE: cracker images (Andy Schmitt)
> 8. Flash Images (Levi N Brown)
> 9. Re: Flash Images (Erich C. Decker)
> 10. Re: Flash Images (Levi N Brown)
> 11. Re: Flash Images (B2MYOUNG@aol.com)
> 12. RE: Flash Images (peregoy)
> 13. Re: Flash Images (Levi N Brown)
> 14. Re: Flash Images (Katharine Thayer)
> 15. Re: Re: digital giclee (Chuck Flagg)
> 16. Re: cracker images (Mike Vande Bunt)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "William Erickson" <erickson@ic.mankato.mn.us>
> To: "pinhole Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:47:33 -0600
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure with paper negaties.
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I've been doing some multiple hour exposures on kodak polymax paper and I
> got to wondering at what length of exposure with a paper negative do you
> need to begin to factor in reciprocity failure. My results suggest that the
> answer may be around 1 hour. Any ideas?
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "William Erickson" <erickson@ic.mankato.mn.us>
> To: "pinhole Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 05:57:31 -0600
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I uploaded four images made with "cracker 2". I'll place some shots of the
> camera when I get the film developed. The pinhole is a ritz cracker adhered
> to a carboard box with peanut butter. 8x10 paper negative. The doll head in
> most of the images is a doll head mold I bought from Nancy Spenser at
> Pinhole Resource. Sort of a thank you to them for freeing me to play this
> much. The anamorphic image occurred because the paper negative fell forward
> and sideways out of its holder. By the bye, three of my images are in the
> latest issue of Pinhole Journal as well.
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/bones.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/cabbage.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/oldfruit.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/anamorphic.jpg
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 07:48:56 +0000
> From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> William Erickson wrote:
>
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/abones.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/acabbage.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/aoldfruit.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/aanamorphic.jpg
> >
>
> The extra a was omitted in the original links. (abones, acabbage,
> aoldfruit aanamorphic)
>
> I can see I'm going to have to buy some crackers and peanut butter to
> try to prove to myself that this can be done. Amazing.
> Katharine Thayer
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Andy Schmitt" <aschmitt@warwick.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:28:21 -0500
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> ok, ok, ok I'll buy a box of Ritz...Do I have to use Skippy PB of is the
> chunky stuff ok...no I guess the chunks would cause light leeks ( 8o) )....
> andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of William
> Erickson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:58 AM
> To: pinhole Discussion
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
>
> I uploaded four images made with "cracker 2". I'll place some shots of the
> camera when I get the film developed. The pinhole is a ritz cracker adhered
> to a carboard box with peanut butter. 8x10 paper negative. The doll head in
> most of the images is a doll head mold I bought from Nancy Spenser at
> Pinhole Resource. Sort of a thank you to them for freeing me to play this
> much. The anamorphic image occurred because the paper negative fell forward
> and sideways out of its holder. By the bye, three of my images are in the
> latest issue of Pinhole Journal as well.
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/bones.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/cabbage.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/oldfruit.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/anamorphic.jpg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: "Andy Schmitt" <aschmitt@warwick.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:32:51 -0500
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> I figure we could make an almost completely organic camera by hollowing out
> a watermelon or a giant pumpkin.
> Putting the cracker on 1 end and a film holder on the other end. It would be
> about the proper focal length.
> Pity, there aren't any left around here....
> Maybe in the south??????
> andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of William
> Erickson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:58 AM
> To: pinhole Discussion
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
>
> I uploaded four images made with "cracker 2". I'll place some shots of the
> camera when I get the film developed. The pinhole is a ritz cracker adhered
> to a carboard box with peanut butter. 8x10 paper negative. The doll head in
> most of the images is a doll head mold I bought from Nancy Spenser at
> Pinhole Resource. Sort of a thank you to them for freeing me to play this
> much. The anamorphic image occurred because the paper negative fell forward
> and sideways out of its holder. By the bye, three of my images are in the
> latest issue of Pinhole Journal as well.
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/bones.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/cabbage.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/oldfruit.jpg
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/anamorphic.jpg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "Michael Keller" <m.w.keller@verizon.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:13:37 -0500
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Pumpkin would transmit light through its sides, although if you used photo
> paper which isn't sensitive to orange light...
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> |[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Andy Schmitt
> |Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:33 AM
> |To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> |Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> |
> |
> |I figure we could make an almost completely organic camera by hollowing out
> |a watermelon or a giant pumpkin.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: "Andy Schmitt" <aschmitt@warwick.net>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com>
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:52:44 -0500
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> possibly either ortho or Kodak COPY film....
> Of course, you "could" coat the inside with peanut butter...yumyum
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Michael Keller
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:14 PM
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
>
> Pumpkin would transmit light through its sides, although if you used photo
> paper which isn't sensitive to orange light...
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
> |[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Andy Schmitt
> |Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:33 AM
> |To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> |Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> |
> |
> |I figure we could make an almost completely organic camera by hollowing out
> |a watermelon or a giant pumpkin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:08:51 -0800
> From: Levi N Brown <kerplop1@juno.com>
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ----__JNP_000_69cc.058e.18c4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Here are links to two self portraits that were made using flash as the
> light source. Both were shot with a converted Hasselblad body (lens
> board was made out of matt board, brass shim stock and gaff tape) shot on
> Tri-X 320 film and processed in HC-110. The exposures were both 4 "pops"
> of the flash, with an original meter reading of F-45. These are the
> beginning of a series I'm working on.
>
> ~Levi
>
> A Self Portrait-
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg
>
> Another Self Porfrait - both the hand and the figure are mine
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/hand.jpg
> ----__JNP_000_69cc.058e.18c4
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" http-equiv=3DContent-=
> Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY bottomMargin=3D0 leftMargin=3D3 rightMargin=3D3 topMargin=3D0>
> <DIV></DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>Here are links to two self portraits that were made using flash as&=
> nbsp;the=20
> light source. Both were shot with a converted Hasselblad body (lens =
> board=20
> was made out of matt board, brass shim stock and gaff tape) shot on Tri-X =
> 320=20
> film and processed in HC-110. The exposures were both 4 "pops" of the=
> =20
> flash, with an original meter reading of F-45. These are the =
> beginning of=20
> a series I'm working on.</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV> &=
> nbsp; =20
> ~Levi</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>A Self Portrait-<BR><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg">http:=
> //www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg</A></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>Another Self Porfrait - both the hand and the figure are mine<BR><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/hand.jpg">http://=
> www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/hand.jpg</A>=20
> </DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ----__JNP_000_69cc.058e.18c4--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 22:45:35 +0100
> From: "Erich C. Decker" <fotair@rz-online.de>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Levi,
>
> Wow!
> What a revelation :-)
>
> > The exposures were both 4 "pops" of the flash,
> > with an original meter reading of F-45.
> > These are the beginning of a series I'm working on.
>
> Superb job, especially your self-portrait.
> Your technical stats give me something to work on.
>
> Just one question though:
> You do not mention the type of flash you use
> and it's maximum power in watt/seconds. Please enlighten us
> on that aspect too.
>
> > A Self Portrait-
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg
>
> Once again: absolutely gorgeous.
>
> Erich
>
> http.//www.fotair.de
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:44:03 -0800
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> From: Levi N Brown <kerplop1@juno.com>
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> > Just one question though:
> > You do not mention the type of flash you use
> > and it's maximum power in watt/seconds. Please enlighten us
> > on that aspect too.
>
> These were made using one flash head on a 600WS Photogenic power back -
> full power. The flash is about 3' from the subject (rough guesstimate)
> and has a snoot on it. The flash was fired using a flash meter.
>
> > > A Self Portrait-
> > > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg
> >
> > Once again: absolutely gorgeous.
>
> > Erich
>
> > http.//www.fotair.de
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> From: B2MYOUNG@aol.com
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 18:21:56 EST
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> To: fotair@rz-online.de, pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> In a message dated 12/5/00 4:51:27 PM, fotair@rz-online.de writes:
>
> << Once again: absolutely gorgeous. >>
>
> I'll second that.
> Stunning.
> leezy
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:26:20 -0500
> From: peregoy <peregoy@umbc.edu>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Great work. What was the f stop of your pinhole?
>
> >===== Original Message From pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com =====
> >> Just one question though:
> >> You do not mention the type of flash you use
> >> and it's maximum power in watt/seconds. Please enlighten us
> >> on that aspect too.
> >
> >These were made using one flash head on a 600WS Photogenic power back -
> >full power. The flash is about 3' from the subject (rough guesstimate)
> >and has a snoot on it. The flash was fired using a flash meter.
> >
> >> > A Self Portrait-
> >> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg
> >>
> >> Once again: absolutely gorgeous.
> >
> >> Erich
> >
> >> http.//www.fotair.de
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> >Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> >unsubscribe or change your account at
> >http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> Chris Peregoy
> peregoy@umbc.edu
> http://userpages.umbc.edu/~peregoy
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:38:43 -0800
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> From: Levi N Brown <kerplop1@juno.com>
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> >peregoy <peregoy@umbc.edu> writes:
> > Great work. What was the f stop of your pinhole?
>
> I calculate it at F-160. The actual size of the hole is (I beleive)
> .018"
>
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/portrait.jpg
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 16:54:37 +0000
> From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Flash Images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> B2MYOUNG@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 12/5/00 4:51:27 PM, fotair@rz-online.de writes:
> >
> > << Once again: absolutely gorgeous. >>
> >
> > I'll second that.
> > Stunning.
> > leezy
> >
>
> Ditto. Very nice.
> Katharine
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 19:01:27 -0800
> From: Chuck Flagg <cflagg@ispchannel.com>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: digital giclee
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Gregg,
> I am in the market for a new printer and am considering doing more printing
> digitally of my pinhole photos.
>
> > Generally speaking, you get the right color match when setting up and
> > "calibrating" your monitor and printer, not with each image you print. But
> > in practice, I tend to make several "test" prints using cheaper paper until
> > I have what I want, then print on higher quality paper (same as I've always
> > done in a darkroom).
>
> What are some of the "higher quality papers" that you have had success using
> your printing digital photos? Are you cutting them to fit the printer or are
> you finding them in standarts sizes?
> Thanks,
> -Chuck-
>
> >
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:28:50 -0600
> From: Mike Vande Bunt <Mike.VandeBunt@mixcom.com>
> To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] cracker images
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
>
> Neat. I especially like the accidental anamorphic shot.
> When you do more "pictures of food with food" shots
> you will naturally want to include one of Ritz crackers
> with peanut butter...
>
> Mike Vande Bunt
>
> William Erickson wrote:
>
> > I uploaded four images made with "cracker 2". I'll place some shots of the
> > camera when I get the film developed. The pinhole is a ritz cracker adhered
> > to a carboard box with peanut butter. 8x10 paper negative. The doll head in
> > most of the images is a doll head mold I bought from Nancy Spenser at
> > Pinhole Resource. Sort of a thank you to them for freeing me to play this
> > much. The anamorphic image occurred because the paper negative fell forward
> > and sideways out of its holder. By the bye, three of my images are in the
> > latest issue of Pinhole Journal as well.
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/bones.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/cabbage.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/oldfruit.jpg
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/anamorphic.jpg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
> End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest
Received on Wed Dec 6 07:16:46 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:15:56 PST
