Re: moving image

From: edwin gendron <egendron_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 14 Nov 2000 - 12:53:21 PST

2 words about "hand processing" your 16mm motion picture
film.....different chemicals. At least I know some stocks are and I
THINK that all of them are.
BUT if you shoot up to 100 feet this way (2 & 3/4 minutes running)
you can get it easily & hassle free processed at a motion picture lab
for about $20 - 30.

>Hello, all:
>
>I just subscribed (as of yesterday), having cast about for a way to shoot
>a 16 mm film without renting a camera, without paying a lab's developing
>fee, and without boring my easily-bored eyes. Hitting the web for tips, I
>have rigged a little canister for 35 mm still photography with both
>pinhole and slots through which to advance 16 mm film. It was a lazy
>Sunday I spent dabbling without much conviction, scrounging around for
>tape, glue, a box, you know the story. I am still amazed that this should
>work, in theory at least. We have a simple mechanism for advancing the
>frame and keeping registration without exposing frames to light until they
>enter the gate of the canister. Has this been done? Once exposed, I'll
>have only to hand-process the thing. And then, . . a movie . . of
>pinhole photographs!
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>unsubscribe or change your account at
>http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/

-- 
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Edwin Gendron
Virginia Tech
Residential and Dining Programs Graphics
43 Owens Hall (0223)
Blacksburg, Va. 24061
(540)231-5398
egendron@vt.edu
Received on Tue Nov 14 15:53:43 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:15:56 PST